Photo Credit: Getty Images
A Los Angeles judge has ruled that singer and actress Halle Bailey and rapper DDG are prohibited from posting images or videos of their infant son, Halo, on social media platforms while their ongoing legal dispute plays out. The decision, handed down this week, follows months of tension between the celebrity couple over how much of their child’s life should be shared with the public.
Court documents indicate that the order was issued as part of a broader case concerning privacy, custody, and the child’s welfare. The judge determined that withholding Halo from social media was in the best interest of the child, citing concerns about online exploitation, safety, and the potential long-term effects of early public exposure.
Bailey, 24, rose to stardom as one half of the R&B duo Chloe x Halle before landing the leading role in Disney’s The Little Mermaid. Her partner, DDG, 26, is a rapper and YouTube personality with millions of followers across digital platforms. Together, the pair have attracted significant attention from fans and tabloids, especially since the quiet birth of their son in late 2023.
The dispute reportedly escalated after disagreements about whether Halo should appear online. Bailey, who has occasionally spoken about her desire to protect her child’s privacy, has expressed frustration with the constant public scrutiny surrounding her family. DDG, who built his career in part through online content, has faced criticism for sharing glimpses of their son against Bailey’s wishes.
The judge emphasized that the order is temporary and subject to review in future hearings. Both parents remain active in raising Halo and continue to share custody, but the court underscored that decisions regarding his online presence must prioritize the child’s well-being over the parents’ public images.
Neither Bailey nor DDG has issued an official statement in response to the ruling. However, sources close to the couple suggest that while the order may cause tension, it could also provide clarity in balancing their careers with protecting their child. The case is expected to return to court later this year for further consideration.