Photo Credit:Getty Images
Brianna J. Rivers, a 30-year-old woman from New York City, was arrested on April 10, 2025, for allegedly assaulting pro-life activist Savannah Craven Antao during a street interview in Harlem. The incident, captured on video, shows Rivers striking Antao in the face, resulting in a laceration that required two stitches. Rivers was charged with second-degree assault by the New York Police Department.
The altercation occurred on April 3, 2025, near West 126th Street and Lenox Avenue. Antao, a 23-year-old pro-life advocate, was conducting interviews for her YouTube channel in collaboration with Live Action, a pro-life organization. During the exchange, Rivers expressed her views on the challenges of parenthood, leading to a tense conversation that escalated when she allegedly punched Antao.
Following the incident, Antao received medical attention and expressed her intention to continue her advocacy work. She also initiated a fundraising campaign to enhance her security during public engagements.
In response to the widespread attention the video received, Rivers issued a public apology while also accusing Antao of provoking the situation. She claimed that the released footage did not capture the full context of their interaction and labeled Antao as a professional antagonist." Rivers emphasized that while she regretted her actions, she felt misrepresented by the viral video.
“ I want to sincerely apologize for my actions during the incident that occurred on April 3rd in Harlem. Regardless of the circumstances or emotions involved, resorting to physical violence was wrong, and I take full responsibility for that moment,” Rivers wrote in a public apology. “What started as a conversation quickly escalated in a way that I deeply regret. While I strongly believe in open dialogue and the freedom to express differing opinions, I let my emotions get the better of me. I should have walked away.”
To support her legal defense, Rivers launched a GoFundMe campaign, which reportedly raised nearly $9,000 before being taken down.
The incident has sparked a broader conversation about the boundaries of free speech, the nature of public discourse, and the responsibilities of activists. As legal proceedings continue, the case remains a focal point in discussions about civil engagement and the appropriate ways to address deeply held beliefs in public forums.